King David's %: Establishing a new symbol for Bayesian probability.
laulpogan.substack.com
“The old Frequentist vs. Bayesian debate” Disclaimer #1 (Bias): I’m not a huge fan of using expert testimony to establish predictions about what will happen in the future. That said, I respect the Bayesian hustle- it’s more pragmatic and dabbles less in empirical fetishism. Though I associate frequentist methods with objectivity here, I acknowledge experiment design is a subjective process and that it’s impossible for something to be well and truly “objective.”
King David's %: Establishing a new symbol for Bayesian probability.
King David's %: Establishing a new symbol for…
King David's %: Establishing a new symbol for Bayesian probability.
“The old Frequentist vs. Bayesian debate” Disclaimer #1 (Bias): I’m not a huge fan of using expert testimony to establish predictions about what will happen in the future. That said, I respect the Bayesian hustle- it’s more pragmatic and dabbles less in empirical fetishism. Though I associate frequentist methods with objectivity here, I acknowledge experiment design is a subjective process and that it’s impossible for something to be well and truly “objective.”